top of page
Search

To home, or to office?

Every day the discussion on going back to the office or continuing to work remotely grows, and it is evident that companies struggle.


Without discussing the pros and cons, I see the situation from a different angle – change management.


Some companies' senior managers find it difficult to accept that their employees can work without being seen. I can see more companies pulling their workers back to many-hours-a-day commutes to congratulate themselves on using their "human resources" more effectively – some big names like Amazon, Activision, Disney, Starbucks, and others are among them.


And what do employees do? Some happily oblige and waste the company's time behind their firm's desks. Last week Fortune published an article which suggests the real reason for the slump

in productivity is the return to the office, and some of its conclusions are genuinely challenging.


It is better to acknowledge and get the best out of change when the change happens. Those who resist often resemble XIX century Luddites, fighting against the inevitable future. From my experience, measuring productivity by someone's presence is a poor management practice.


Offices should now be incubators of creativity, stronger relationships and collaboration – for that, in my opinion, five days a week is overkill.




 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Processes - think carefully.

I was away last week, recharging batteries and re-reading Reed Hasting’s book “No Rules Rules” with a particular focus on the pitfalls of...

 
 
 
FORBES ON HYBRID WORK

Once again, Forbes contributes to the discussion on hybrid working and the numbers are shocking: ·        Over a quarter of workers...

 
 
 
the Five Ws of managing change

Recently, I was sent an article in which the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) concluded that wood was the most sustainable...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page